Research

DFG-Project "Arguments About the Public Sphere and the Future of the Commons: Property relations in the context of welfare state transformation" Expand entry

Subproject C04 in the Collaborative Research Centre/Transregio 294 “Structural Transformation of Property” at the Universities of Jena and Erfurt. Click here for the Website of the Collaborative Research Centre/ Transregio SFB TRR 294 “Structural Transformation of Property” and here directly for Subproject C04.

Project management: Prof. Dr. Silke van Dyk
Research assistant: Dr. Markus Kip

Student assistants: Moritz Heinrich and Luzie Gerstenhöfer

Contact: silke.vandyk@uni-jena.de

Duration: April 2021 – December 2024

Welfare states are an institutional response to the social dislocations of societies in which the private ownership of the means of production and assets is concentrated in the hands of a few, while the majority is dependent on selling its labor power. While in Fordist welfare states the importance of private property was relativised by (wage-substituting) benefits, public services and the regulation of property owners’ power, since the late 1970s processes of deregulation, commodification and privatisation have caused a dismantling and restructuring of social rights and public property. These longer-term developments were exacerbated in many countries by the consequences of the financial and economic crisis of 2007/2008 and the prevalence of austerity policies.

In the sense of the SFB’s disembedding thesis, the subproject’s research is based on the assumption that, in the course of these processes, a disembedding of private property has taken place that varies from country to country, which is at the same time structured by and effective in municipal contexts and which has the potential to endanger social reproduction through cuts and restructuring of (wage-substituting) services and public services of general interest. Against this backdrop, the boom of local alternative economies, commons and new forms of subsistence, the growing importance of sharing economies and new municipalisms, along with political efforts for the remunicipalisation of infrastructure are examined as counter-movements (in the sense of Polanyi’s ‘double movement’) which are striving for new forms of regulation. Specifically, the subproject asks how, under conditions of austerity and the economic, political and social counter-movements reacting to it, firstly, the interplay of public, private and municipal property is restructured, secondly, what role social and labor-related (protection) rights and non-property-based lending and utilisation arrangements play in this process and, thirdly, what effects this has – in the sense of a structural change through property – on the modes of welfare state governance.

The subproject collects empirical data in Great Britain and Spain, two countries that were both severely affected by the financial and economic crisis and reacted with comprehensive austerity measures. At the same time, the countries differ with regard to their welfare state regimes and the history of deregulation and privatisation, as well as with regard to the scope of municipal actors and the significance of local counter-movements. The subproject takes an empirical approach on three levels. Firstly, it examines the country-specific processes of welfare state re-structuring and disembedding since 2008. Secondly, it analyses their implementation and design in two urban contexts (Barcelona and Liverpool), also taking into account countervailing developments (e.g. re-municipalisation) and related political struggles. Thirdly, the subproject examines selected civil society projects in the study cities that close gaps in services of general interest on the basis of commons (common property or practices of use and sharing). The central question here is what role commons play in times of crisis for dealing with the social question beyond welfare state institutions and services, and what effects they have on (local) property systems.

DFG-Project "Ownership of the Human Body in the Context of Transnational Economies of Reproduction" Expand entry

Subproject C04 in the Collaborative Research Centre/Transregio 294 “Structural Transformation of Property” at the Universities of Jena and Erfurt. Click here for the Website of the Collaborative Research Centre/ Transregio SFB TRR 294 “Structural Transformation of Property” and here directly for Subproject C02.

Project management: PD Dr Stefanie Graefe, PD Dr Susanne Lettow https://www.mvbz.fu-berlin.de/ueber-uns/team/lettow/index.html

Research assistant: Merle Heusmann

Student assistants: Lea Kolling and Klara Morfeld

Contact: stefanie.graefe@uni-jena.de

Duration: April 2021 – December 2024

New services such as sperm and egg donation or surrogacy turn bodily materials such as eggs and sperm into objects that can be sold and appropriated. These practices are embedded in the development of transnational reproductive economies in which reproductive clinics, tissue banks and intermediary agencies interact across countries. In this context, human bodily substances become property objects in a historically novel way. At the same time, new property subjects emerge who relate to their own or other people’s bodily substances in specific ways. In this way, anchored notions of subjectivity, corporeality, family and reproduction are set in motion, and new forms of property-mediated bodily-, self- and social relations emerge.

The research project is designed as a philosophical-sociological double project. It aims to investigate the interplay of discursive, institutional and subjective processes of “doing property”. The object of research is, firstly, international bioethical debates on the problem of ownership of the human body. Secondly, with the help of qualitative research methods, patterns of interpretation and practices of different actors in connection with the extraction, commercialisation and appropriation of human egg cells in and between Germany and Spain will be investigated.

DFG-Project “Voluntary work as a resource in contemporary capitalism” Expand entry
„Freiwilligkeit als Ressource im Gegenwartskapitalismus“ „Freiwilligkeit als Ressource im Gegenwartskapitalismus“ Image: Arbeitsbereich Politische Soziologie

Sociological project within the DFG funded interdisciplinary research group on “Voluntary work” (Erfurt, Oldenburg, Jena)

https://www.uni-erfurt.de/philosophische-fakultaet/forschung/forschungsgruppen/freiwilligkeit

Duration: October 2020 to September 2023

Directors: Prof. Dr. Silke van Dyk, PD Dr. Stefanie Graefe

Contact: silke.vandyk@uni-jena.de; stefanie.graefe@uni-jena.de

 

 

As a result of fundamental changes to the welfare state, the flexibilization of the labour market and the digital revolution, demand is emerging for occupations and activities that are (expected to be) carried out more or less unpaid, informally and on a voluntary basis, from involvement in a care support centre and unpaid (overtime) work in companies to the value-added activity of consumers in the digital economy. Our basic assumption is that voluntary work is becoming the lynchpin of a newly emerging mixed-activity economy. The project explores this assumption in the following areas of study: a) forms of unpaid or low-paid work on digital platforms (prosuming, clickworking, sharing); b) voluntary involvement of dependent employees in companies in the digital economy, and c) civil society activities organized in analogue contexts.

The project’s aim in selecting these areas for study is to examine portfolios of voluntary work that are typical of contemporary society, beyond workplace-based paid and regulated work and classical domestic work. Our research interest is directed in particular at activities that are gaining greater significance in the context of the currently emerging and expanding digital economy. The aim is to explore comparatively the way these activities are organized and combined in Germany and the US, in order to discover more about the influence of different welfare-state path dependencies.

 

 

“DIY society? Informal Economies and social participation in poor rural areas” (Gesema) Expand entry
Grafik: Tine Haubner Grafik: Tine Haubner Graphic: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

 

BMBF research project within the topic area “Participation and the Common Good”

Duration: January 2020 to December 2023

Directors: Dr. Tine Haubner and Prof. Dr. Silke van Dyk

Research assistants: Dr. Mike Laufenberg and Laura Boemke M.A.

Student assistant: Wanda Gehrt

Contact: gesema@uni-jena.de  / Tel.: +49 3641 9-45550 (Secretariat)

 

Given the pressure on municipal finances and the challenges posed by demographic change, academia, politicians and the media are increasingly focusing their attention on rural areas with particular regard to processes of peripherization and shrinkage. While social and political crises in rural areas often take centre stage, these same rural areas are seeing a period of renaissance as spaces of political experimentation for civil society-based self-determination, in which gaps in infrastructure and welfare provision are being filled independently of the market and the state. The watchword “do-it-yourself society” alludes to a trend towards a “new community ethic” (Frech et al. 2017: 15), in the course of which neighbourhood projects, self-help, civic engagement and the cooperative subsistence economy are becoming more prominent (once again). At the same time, these developments are being encouraged through social policy measures: the “activating” social state places growing emphasis on supporting the local engagement and informal support offered by “caring communities”. The socially integrative potential and impact upon the common good of local self-help, activist and support networks is acknowledged and appreciated almost univocally in the political domain. But what is the actual situation regarding the enhanced status of rural structures by old as well as new forms of informal activities? What potential as well as limitations exist in a (re)vitalization of the community ethic? And how in this way can local funding pressures be offset and growing social and regional inequalities be addressed?

On the one hand the research project explores the question of how informal economies and informal self-help and support structures in structurally weak rural areas are organized, where and how they replace previously public provision and what significance they acquire in conditions of rural flight and shrinkage, social inequality and municipal funding shortfalls. Equally, it seeks to examine the conditions under which these informal structures have a participatory impact and enhance the common good, and when by contrast they (may) risk establishing an exclusive kind of solidarity, furthering processes of social polarization, revitalizing traditional gender roles and undermining professional standards.

 

The project asks specifically:

1) whether processes of informalization affecting social welfare provision that was once publicly regulated can be observed in rural areas affected by poverty;

2) how the (traditional) informal economy is structured at the local level and which activities and forms of self-sufficiency and exchange, civic engagement, support and cooperation exist;

3) to what extent informal and civil society self-help and support structures offer robust responses to local resource shortfalls in rural areas affected by poverty and may be able to contribute toward the common good and social participation, and finally

4) how local actors interpret activities and forms of self-sufficiency and cooperation, and which views or expectations they have in relation to the social welfare state, the labour market, democracy and civil society. Alongside the institutional setting, the project also examines practices and socio-economic consequences of informal self-help and support networks, subjective patterns of interpretation and the images of society held by rural actors – after all, these are what make it possible to understand social action and ideas about social participation and the common good in the first place. Using a mix of methods consisting of expert interviews, problem-centred interviews, intergenerational group discussions, ethnographic household studies and documentary and data analyses, the project looks at four rural regions affected by poverty in a comparison between eastern and western Germany.

 

"New Culture of Helping Others or Shadow Economy? Civic engagement and voluntary work amidst structural transformation in the welfare state" Expand entry
Engage Engage Image: AB Politische Soziologie

Research project funded by the Hans Böckler Foundation

Duration: April 2017 to September 2020

Project directors: Prof. Dr. Silke van Dyk and Dr. Tine Haubner

Research co-worker: Laura Boemke

Student co-workers: Manuel Jaeschke, Franziska Wiest

 

The state financial crisis along with a crisis in social reproduction has prompted a process of restructuring in which the welfare state delegates certain tasks to (or “activates”) its citizens. In this context, the caring potential of unpaid work – including that undertaken outside family contexts – acquires political significance. At a time when fewer and fewer women are available all day to act as a "secret resource of social policy" (Beck-Gernsheim 1991: 66), the moral obligation of all citizens of the welfare state to engage in activities that serve the common good is increasingly being proclaimed. In view of the empirically confirmed political support for civic engagement and voluntary work as a new productivity resource, we are interested in the extent to which specific activities are utilized by the state as a subsidiary form of welfare provision and how this situation is experienced, interpreted and co-shaped by engaged citizens and those receiving assistance alike.
While there is no lack of overarching analyses or case studies of individual domains of civic engagement, there are few empirical analyses grounded firmly in welfare state theory which examine the appropriation of unpaid or low-waged work in different domains and explore their material and symbolic function in the “welfare state mix” from a comparative perspective. Starting by reconstructing the broader institutional and discursive conditions of civic engagement and voluntary work within the “activating” welfare state, a set of exploratory case studies will be conducted in Baden-Württemberg and Berlin/Brandenburg in relation to the three empirical pillars ‘help for refugees’, ‘care’ and ‘municipal infrastructure’, the aim being – by means of comparison – to facilitate a more precise analysis of mechanisms and use(r) practices in the difference domains of engagement.
The project is characterized by its interlinking of three analytical levels which, in previous research, have generally existed alongside one another in an unconnected way: the macrosociological analysis of political support in specific contexts, political institutions and political policies (level 1), i.e. an analysis of the "governance of voluntariness" (Regierung der Freiwilligkeit, Neumann 2016: 23) is complemented by a study involving qualitative interviews with engaged citizens and those receiving assistance, looking particularly at the micropolitics of voluntary work (e.g. in terms of meaning-making, being overwhelmed or the experience of dependency) in the three empirical pillars (level 2). The key question here concerns the intrinsic meaning – and thus not least the potential for critique and resistance – of voluntary civic engagement in the “activating” welfare state. The third analytical level addresses the political and economic as well as professional implications of appropriating civic engagement and voluntary work. That is, it explores – in addition to the micropolitics of voluntary work from the point of view of those doing it – its material and professional consequences for the future of social welfare provision and paid work. Looking at all three analytical levels together addresses the overarching question of to what extent the act of promoting, demanding and appropriating civic engagement and voluntary work in the “activating” state becomes a vehicle for processes of informalization and de-professionalization. A New Culture of Helping Others or Shadow Economy? Volunteer Labour and Welfare State Transformation in Germany


Interview about the research

Über Community-Kapitalismus, helfende Hände und einen Arbeitsmarkt unterhalb des Mindestlohns“ – Emma Dowling und Silke van Dyk im Gespräch mit Friederike Bahl, Online-Beitrag auf: Soziopolis. Gesellschaft beobachten, 14.11.2018.  https://soziopolis.de/beobachten/wirtschaft/artikel/interview/

Publications

Tine Haubner, Silke van Dyk & Laura Boemke (2020): „Im Westen nichts Neues, im Osten noch selten? Freiwilliges Engagement im Spannungsfeld von Nachwende-Erbe und neuen Herausforderungen“, in: Voluntaris, 8 (1), S. 57-72.

Silke van Dyk (2019): „Von der Nothilfe zur politischen Ökonomie des Helfens. Flüchtlingshilfe in der Freiwilligengesellschaft“, in Kristina Binner & Karin Scherschel (Hg.), Fluchtmigration und Gesellschaft. Von Nutzenkalkülen, Solidarität und Exklusion, Weinheim/Basel: Beltz Juventa, S. 32-49.

Silke van Dyk & Tine Haubner (2019): „Gemeinschaft als Ressource? Engagement und Freiwilligenarbeit im Strukturwandel des Wohlfahrtsstaats“, in: A. Doris Baumgartner & Beat Fux (Hg.), Sozialstaat unter Zugzwang? Zwischen Reform und radikaler Neuorientierung, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, S. 259-280.

Tine Haubner (2019): "Das soziale Band neu knüpfen? Bürgerschaftliche Sorge-Dienstleistungen im Schatten von Arbeitsmarkt und Sozialstaat",in: Klaus Dörre & Hartmut Rosa (Hg.), Große Transformation? Zur Zukunft moderner Gesellschaften. Sonderband des Berliner Journals für Soziologie, S. 197-210.

An Overview of the Department for Political Sociology